By Oscar Y. Harward
There is much disbelief in every word coming from the lips of President Obama. Prior to the 2008 Presidential Election, Obama had many questionable friends and associates who had unsavory backgrounds. While serving in the Illinois State Senate, Sen. Obama promoted left-wing legislation and revolutionary liberal public funding. During Obama’s term in the US Senate, Obama continued with, questionably, the most “radically liberal” legislation of the time. During his tenure as a candidate for President, Obama repeated his “radically liberal” message.
An overwhelming majority of main-stream Media members are so supportive of left-wing politics. The majority liberal main-stream Medias continued, and even today, continues to give Obama “passes” on the issues. Liberal main-stream Medias elect to deny the facts, fail and report the news by ignoring his words and/or activities, or spinning unwise words into a positive story.
Now, President Obama is pushing the US Senate for a positive vote on ratification of a new nuclear-arms treaty agreement with Russia. Obama refers to the new treaty as a “national security imperative”.
Obama says it is not about politics. It is all about national security. President Obama, oh yes it is. It is all about our national security, Europe’s continued freedoms, and protecting the “free world” from Russia’s missiles and their aggressive Communist Party politics.
President G.W. Bush had planned to install an anti-missile ground-based system in the State of “free and independent” Georgia, Europe. After the 2008 General Election of President Obama, Russia invaded Georgia and seized control of Georgia. Without any dispute of Russia invading Georgia from President Obama, that prevented the United States from installing an anti-missile system in Georgia.
Under Obama’s new nuclear-arms treaty agreement, the Russian asked for and President Obama guaranteed that the United States will not set up an anti-missile ground-based system in the State of Poland and/or the Czech Republic in Europe. This anti-missile system would protect European allies. Obama claims that a mobile system is just as effective and less expensive.
The major problem in is that President Obama has, on numerous occasions, proven that the words from his lips may be “untruthful words”. Obama’s expressions of today are opposite of his words of yesterday. Obama’s speech of today are probably opposite of his words of tomorrow. President Obama is attempting to present his new nuclear-arms treaty agreement with Russia comparable to the late President Ronald Reagan’s Strategic Arms Reduction Talks (START). Any ratification of Obama’s new nuclear-arms treaty agreement with Russia supported on Obama’s explanations is problematic.
It appears President Obama may be preparing a puzzle, one piece at a time, not to build upon our prosperous nation, but to wreck or transfer America’s Constitutional freedoms and our treasured Judeo-Christian values.
President Reagan’s agreement eventually brought down the “Iron-Wall”, or as it was recognized as the Communist Party’s Soviet Union bloc. In doing so, the Berlin wall fell and unified Berlin, Germany. Who can compare Obama’s success(es) around the world to the multiple successes of Ronald Reagan http://www.reaganfoundation.org/default.aspx?
President Obama, Ronald Reagan was a friend of mine, and President Obama, you are not a Ronald Reagan!